My Confirmation Saint

← Every saint

St. James the Less

He found the settlement. At the council in Jerusalem he spoke after Peter and proposed the terms that let Gentile converts into the Church without binding them to the whole Mosaic law, asking only a few things of them out of respect for Jewish Christians. He went on keeping the law himself.

Feast May 3Jerusalem, if he is the brother of the Lord

Canonized

No year of birth appears in any document held here, and no year of death is printed, though a year exists. Benedict XVI dates the death to the year 62, following the Jewish historian Josephus. That is the death of the man who led the church at Jerusalem, and it belongs to this apostle only if the two are one man — which is the question this record cannot settle, and which the sources at the foot of this page set out. The feast on 3 May is the day the Church keeps him, with Philip, and not a date in his life. The Catholic Encyclopedia records an older Eastern practice of keeping him on 27 December, together with St John.

There are two apostles called James, and this is the one called the Less. That is not a judgement on him. Benedict XVI said the titles are certainly not intended to measure their holiness, but only to note the different importance the two men have in the New Testament.

What the Gospels give him is one line, four times over: he is in every list of the Twelve, and every list calls him the son of Alphaeus. Nothing else in them is certainly his.

Then comes the problem, and it is why there is more to say. Several men in the New Testament are called James, and one of them — the brother of the Lord, who led the church in Jerusalem — has a whole life on record. The Church has long held that he and the son of Alphaeus are one man. The Catholic Encyclopedia argues for it and is honest about the cost: the identification is “contested by many critics and, perhaps, not quite beyond doubt”, and had it not been made, “we should only know his name and his Apostleship”. Benedict XVI, in 2006, said scholars were still debating it.

If it holds, the rest is his. Paul went up to Jerusalem three years after his conversion and saw only Peter and James. At the council there he spoke after Peter and found the settlement that let Gentile converts in without the whole Mosaic law. Paul names him with Peter and John as a “pillar” of that Church, and names him first. Later some men used his name at Antioch to press a line he had never told them to press.

The oldest account of his death is in the Jewish historian Josephus: in the year 62 a high priest used a gap between two Roman governors to have him stoned. His feast is 3 May, kept with Philip.

What they carried

His name was used against his own position. Men arrived at Antioch saying they came from James and pressed a stricter line on Jewish and Gentile Christians eating together; the Catholic Encyclopedia says carefully that he had given them no such commandment. It is the only hardship any document held here records of him.

State of life

apostle · martyr

Themes

hidden work · peacemaking · questions and study · martyrdom

Benedict XVI on James the Less (General Audience, 28 June 2006)

  • FIVE DOCUMENTS CARRY THIS RECORD AND FOUR OF THEM RATE THE SAME ARGUMENT. Three are Catholic Encyclopedia articles: “St. James the Less” (08280a), which is his, “Brethren of the Lord” (02767a), which argues the mechanism, and “Epistle of St. James” (08275b), which is about a book and is held here only for what it says about the identification. The fourth is Benedict XVI’s General Audience of 28 June 2006, read in both editions. Beyond those, four Holy See documents were fetched and read for what they add: a homily for the pallium of 29 June 2008, and General Audiences of 21 November 2007, 24 September 2008 and 1 October 2008. Two further documents held elsewhere in this corpus bear on him and are cited below from where they live. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08280a.htm
  • THE IDENTIFICATION IS THIS RECORD, AND ITS OWN SOURCE SAYS SO IN ONE SENTENCE. The New Testament names several men called James. This one is the Apostle, the son of Alphaeus, and by himself he is a name in a list. Everything else here depends on holding that he is also James the brother of the Lord, who led the church at Jerusalem. The Catholic Encyclopedia states the dependency outright: “Had we not identified James, the son of Alpheus with the brother of the Lord, we should only know his name and his Apostleship. But the identity once admitted, we must consequently apply to him all the particulars supplied by the books of the New Testament.” FOUR HELD SOURCES RATE THAT IDENTIFICATION AND THEY DO NOT AGREE. His own article is the most careful: it is “contested by many critics and, perhaps, not quite beyond doubt, is at least most highly probable”. The article on the Epistle of James agrees with that wording — the view “is by far the most probable” — and adds where the doubt sat: the Fathers of the Western Church mostly identified the author with James the Apostle, while “in the Eastern Church, however, the authority of Eusebius and St. Epiphanius may explain some ecclesiastical doubts about the Apostolic origin of the Epistle”. The article on the Brethren of the Lord is the most confident of the three, calling the identity, “although contested by many Protestant critics”, one that “may also be considered as certain”. And Benedict XVI declines to settle it at all: in Italian he says the question of identifying these two figures of the same name is debated among scholars. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08275b.htm
  • THE ARTICLE ON THE EPISTLE OF JAMES IS HELD HERE, AND IT IS HELD FOR ONE THING ONLY. It is an article about a book of the New Testament, not about a man, and this record takes from it nothing about his life — not the date of the letter, not where it was written, not who it was addressed to. What it is here for is its rating of the identification, quoted in the note above, and its account of where the ancient doubt about that identification sat.
  • HOW THE IDENTIFICATION IS ARGUED, AND THE ARTICLE THAT ARGUES IT IS FILED UNDER ANOTHER SAINT. The reasoning turns on one verse. In Galatians 1:19 Paul writes that on his visit to Jerusalem, “But other of the apostles [besides Cephas] I saw none, saving James the brother of the Lord” — which the encyclopedia reads as making that James an apostle. From there: “there were only two Apostles named James: James the son of Zebedee, and James the son of Alpheus”, and the first was already dead. “James ‘the brother of the Lord’ is therefore one with James the son of Alpheus, and consequently with James the Less.” The same article then joins him to the James of Mark 15:40 through his mother, identifying Mary of Clopas with Mary the mother of James. That article is “Brethren of the Lord”, and this corpus has held it since 2026-09-01 at data/sources/jude/, where it was fetched for the same question about Jude. It is now held under this record as well.
  • WHAT “THE LESS” MEANS, AND A POPE ANSWERS IT IN A DOCUMENT ABOUT THE OTHER JAMES. The week before he reached this man, at the General Audience of 21 June 2006 on James the Greater, Benedict XVI explained the pair of names: the two are “commonly distinguished with the nicknames ‘James the Greater’ and ‘James the Lesser’”, and “these titles are certainly not intended to measure their holiness, but simply to state the different importance they receive in the writings of the New Testament”. The Italian edition says the same. That audience is held in this corpus at data/sources/james-the-greater/, and the sentence is the clearest gloss any held document gives on the surname this record carries.
  • THE ENGLISH EDITION OF THE 2006 AUDIENCE MAKES A CLAIM ABOUT HIS AGE THAT NO SOURCE SUPPORTS. Introducing the man of Mark 15:40, the Italian calls him “il Piccolo”, the Little. The English calls him “the Younger”. Those are not the same claim: one is about size or standing, the other about age. AND THE ENCYCLOPEDIA SETTLES IT AGAINST THE ENGLISH, in a parenthesis about that very verse: he is there called “ò mikros ‘the little’, not the ‘less’, as in the D.V., nor the ‘lesser’”. So the Greek word means little, the Italian renders it little, and the English introduces a fourth word and a new claim. This record follows the Italian and says nothing about his age.
  • AND THE ENGLISH EDITION OF THE SAME AUDIENCE NAMES THE WRONG HIGH PRIEST. Reporting Josephus on his death, the Italian says the sentence was procured “dal Sommo Sacerdote Anano, figlio dell’Annas attestato nei Vangeli” — by Ananus, son of the ANNAS attested in the Gospels. The English has “the High Priest Ananus, a son of the Ananias attested to in the Gospels”. Annas and Ananias are different men. Annas is the high priest of the Gospels; no high priest called Ananias appears in them. So the English sentence points the reader at a man its own description does not fit, and the Italian is right.
  • ONE SCRIPTURE REFERENCE IS WRONG IN THREE OF THE FOUR SOURCES THAT GIVE IT, IN THREE DIFFERENT WAYS. The verse in question is the one where Luke lists James the son of Alphaeus among the Twelve. It is Luke 6:15. The Catholic Encyclopedia gets it right once, in its opening list of the men called James, and then gives “Luke 6:16” twice more — once later in the same article, and once in the article on the Brethren of the Lord. Benedict XVI’s audience gives “Lk 5”, with no verse at all, and the Italian edition gives “Lc 5” — the same error in both editions of the same document. This record cites Luke 6:15, which is what the passage says.
  • THE POPE LEAVES THE IDENTIFICATION OPEN IN 2006 AND USES IT AS SETTLED IN 2008. In the audience that is this man’s portrait, Benedict XVI says the question of identifying James son of Alphaeus with James the brother of the Lord is debated among scholars, and does not decide it. Two years later, preaching at the imposition of the pallium on 29 June 2008, he describes the moment Peter left Jerusalem: Peter “now left the leadership of the Christian-Jewish Church to James the Lesser in order to dedicate himself to his true mission”. The Italian edition says the same, “lascia ora la presidenza della Chiesa cristiano-giudaica a Giacomo il minore”. THAT SENTENCE ASSUMES THE IDENTIFICATION IT DECLINED TO MAKE, because the man who led the church at Jerusalem is the brother of the Lord, and the homily calls him James the Lesser. It is the strongest thing any held document does with the question, and it is done in passing, in a homily about Peter and Paul.
  • WHAT IS ATTRIBUTED TO HIM IF THE IDENTIFICATION HOLDS, AND ALL OF IT COMES WITH THAT CONDITION ATTACHED. He is one of the Twelve, standing at the head of the third group in all four lists. The risen Christ appeared to him. Three years after his conversion Paul went up to Jerusalem and “of the Twelve Apostles he saw only Peter and James the brother of the Lord”. When Peter escaped from prison in the year 44 he asked that word be carried to James, “who held already a marked preeminence in the Church of Jerusalem”. At the Council of Jerusalem “he gives his sentence after St. Peter”, freeing Gentile converts from circumcision and the ceremonial law while urging respect for Jewish scruples, and Benedict XVI credits him with contributing, together with Peter, to integrating the original Jewish dimension of Christianity with that freedom. Paul lists him with Peter and John as “pillars” — and, the pope notes, names him before Peter. Later some men “came from James” to Antioch and pressed a stricter line, “though he had given them no such commandment”. https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/audiences/2006/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20060628.html
  • HOW HE DIED, AND THE TWO SOURCES LEAD WITH DIFFERENT WITNESSES. Benedict XVI takes Josephus and gives both a date and a manner: “The oldest information on the death of this James is given to us by the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus”, who reports in the Jewish Antiquities that a high priest acted illegally in the gap between the departure of the Roman procurator Festus and the arrival of his successor Albinus, and had him stoned in the year 62. The Catholic Encyclopedia leads with a different witness. It reports Hegesippus, a Jewish Christian of about the middle of the second century, whose narrative it calls “highly probable”: that James was called “the Just”, that he drank no wine nor strong drink, nor ate animal food, that no razor touched his head, that he did not anoint himself or make use of the bath, “and lastly that he was put to death by the Jews”. The encyclopedia then says only that “the account of his death given by Josephus is somewhat different”, and of everything else, that “later traditions deserve less attention”.
  • THE FEAST IS 3 MAY AND IT IS SHARED WITH PHILIP. The universal calendar held here, published by the Liturgy Office of the Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales, prints “Ss Philip and James, Apostles” against 3 in May and grades it “feast”. The calendar of the United States bishops agrees, printing “Saints Philip and James, Apostles” in red and grading it Feast, and appointing 1 Corinthians 15:1-8 to be read — the passage in which Paul lists the appearances of the risen Christ, James among them. THE CALENDAR DOES NOT USE HIS SURNAME. It says only James, and neither “the Less” nor “the Younger” appears anywhere in any calendar held here. The Catholic Encyclopedia records an older Eastern practice, in its article on the Apostles: “In the Eastern Church the feast of Saint James the Less and Saint John was celebrated on the 27th of December”.
  • NO PATRONAGE IS RECORDED FOR HIM. No document held here attaches one, and the Catholic Encyclopedia’s article on him never uses the word patron. The Holy See’s own search was then run over vatican.va, in ASCII throughout, on 7 September 2026. The phrasings run in ASCII were “patron of fullers”, “patron of the dying”, “patron of pharmacists” and “James, patron” in English, and “patrono dei farmacisti” and “Giacomo, patrono” in Italian. Four returned nothing. TWO RETURNED DOCUMENTS AND NEITHER IS ABOUT HIM. “patron of pharmacists” returns a General Audience of 7 October 2009 whose subject is St John Leonardi, “canonized on 17 April 1938 and chosen as Patron of Pharmacists on 8 August 2006”; the name James does not occur in it at all. And “Giacomo, patrono” returns John Paul II arriving in Spain in 1982, where the patron is Santiago — James the Greater, whose own record already holds that document.
  • WHAT HE IS CALLED, AND FOUR WORDS ARE IN PLAY FOR TWO GREEK ONES. The surname is not in Scripture as a title: it is how the Church tells two apostles apart, and Benedict XVI says the titles are not meant to measure holiness. The Catholic Encyclopedia calls him “James the Less”. The Holy See’s own documents call him “James the Lesser” — the phrase “James the Less” returns nothing at all on its website in English, while “James the Lesser” returns three documents. The Italian calls him “il Minore”. And Mark 15:40 uses a different word again, which the encyclopedia translates “the little” while rejecting both of the others: he is there called “ò mikros ‘the little’, not the ‘less’, as in the D.V., nor the ‘lesser’”. THAT IS THE ARTICLE DISPUTING ITS OWN TITLE, and it is quoted here because a reader who looks him up will meet both. “The Younger” is not carried at all: it appears once, in the English edition of the 2006 audience, and is a claim about his age that no other source makes.
  • THREE THINGS THIS CARD DOES NOT SAY, AND ALL THREE ARE THE CONDITION SPEAKING RATHER THAN A GAP IN THE READING. NO YEAR OF DEATH IS GIVEN, although a year exists: Benedict XVI dates the death to 62. That is the death of the man who led the church at Jerusalem, and it reaches this apostle only if the identification holds — so it is reported in the sources at the foot of this page and not printed as his date. HE IS NOT LISTED AS A BISHOP, for the same reason and no other. The encyclopedia calls him Bishop of Jerusalem flatly and a pope speaks of him receiving the leadership of that Church, and both of those are downstream of the identification. AND HIS PLACE IS GIVEN CONDITIONALLY, as Jerusalem if he is the brother of the Lord, because that is exactly how firmly the sources place him.